Election 2026

The November 3 election will reshape legislatures. Stay current on every seat, staff, and committee change with GovBuddy.

Stay Current
Home/Bills/AB 1523California · 2025–2026 Regular Session
Assembly BillChaptered/SignedCivil Procedure

AB 1523: Court-ordered mediation.

California · Assembly · 2025–2026 Regular Session · last verified December 13, 2025

What AB 1523 does, verified December 13, 2025

A new law will increase the amount of money that can be involved in a civil case before mediation is allowed, from $50,000 to $75,000. Mediation can only be ordered if there are no ongoing disputes about discovery and at least one party wants to participate. Before mediation, the parties must agree on a mediator, unless the court selects one for them at no cost. The mediation must end with a written statement of agreement or disagreement, and the court will enforce this agreement if the parties agree to it.

Bill journey
✓IntroducedComplete
✓In CommitteeComplete
✓First Chamber FloorComplete
✓Second ChamberComplete
✓GovernorComplete
6ChapteredCurrent
Last action: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 201, Statutes of 2025. (2025-09-02)Alert me
Recent actions23 total · showing 5
Oct. 01, 2025Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 201, Statutes of 2025.
Oct. 01, 2025Approved by the Governor.
Sep. 09, 2025Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
Sep. 03, 2025Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2877.).
Sep. 03, 2025Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0.).
Full action history, 18 earlier actionsConnect Plus
Latest bill textChaptered version, October 1, 2025 · 620 words

Assembly Bill No. 1523
CHAPTER 201

An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 1775.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil procedure.

[ Approved by Governor October 01, 2025. Filed with Secretary of State October 01, 2025. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1523, Committee on Judiciary. Court-ordered mediation.
Existing law prohibits a court from ordering a civil action into mediation when the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000, as specified.
This bill would, as of January 1, 2027, increase the dollar amount of the above-described amount in controversy limitation to $75,000 and impose additional requirements, such as there being no ongoing discovery disputes and at least one party notifying the court of an interest in mediation, to be met before a court may order a civil action into mediation. If the parties do not stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator, the bill would require the court to select a mediator, at no cost to the parties. Court-ordered mediation would be required to conclude with a mutually acceptable statement of agreement or nonagreement, as specified.
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

Section 1775.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:

1775.5.

(a) The court shall not order a case into mediation where the amount in controversy exceeds fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). The determination of the amount in controversy shall be made in the same manner as provided in Section 1141.16 and, in making this determination, the court shall not consider the merits of questions of liability, defenses, or comparative negligence.
(b) This section shall remain in effect until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed.

SEC. 2.

Section 1775.5 is added to the Code of Civil Procedure, to read:

1775.5.

(a) The court shall not order a case into mediation unless all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The amount in controversy does not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). The determination of the amount in controversy shall be made in the same manner as provided in Section 1141.16 and, in making this determination, the court shall not consider the merits of questions of liability, defenses, or comparative negligence.
(2) The case has been set for trial.
(3) At least one party has notified the court of its interest in mediation.
(4) There are no ongoing discovery disputes impacting the case.
(5) The parties have been notified of their option to stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator.
(6) The parties have the ability to mediate through the use of remote technology upon the stipulation of all parties.
(b) If the parties do not stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator within 15 days of the date the case is submitted to mediation, the court shall select a mediator, at no cost to the parties, pursuant to standards adopted by the Judicial Council.
(c) All parties and counsel attending the mediation shall comply with subdivision (a) of Rule 3.894 of the California Rules of Court, except that the parties may utilize any means of remote technology in accordance with the stipulation provided in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a).
(d) Mediation ordered pursuant to subdivision (a) shall conclude in the form of a mutually acceptable agreement or statement of nonagreement, as described in Section 1775.9, no later than 120 days before the trial date described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). Any mediation shall not delay the trial date described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
(e) The determination and any stipulation of the amount in controversy shall be without prejudice as to any finding on the value of the case.
(f) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2027.

Text of AB 1523 as chaptered, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions
GovBuddy Demo

See how GovBuddy fits your team.

Share a few details and our team will follow up with a focused walkthrough.