Election 2026

The November 3 election will reshape legislatures. Stay current on every seat, staff, and committee change with GovBuddy.

Stay Current
Home/Bills/AB 1749California · 2025–2026 Regular Session
Assembly BillChaptered/SignedCivil

AB 1749: Interfering with wildfire suppression and emergency responses with drone.

California · Assembly · 2025–2026 Regular Session · last verified October 1, 2026

What AB 1749 does, verified October 1, 2026

This bill prohibits operating or using drones to interfere with wildfire suppression efforts. It makes it a crime to use drones to impede emergency personnel or military personnel in coping with an emergency. The bill also authorizes the attorney general or local attorneys to bring civil action to enforce the prohibition and allows plaintiffs to recover penalties, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorney's fees if they can prove that the defendant recklessly interfered with the emergency response efforts.

Bill journey
✓IntroducedComplete
✓In CommitteeComplete
✓First Chamber FloorComplete
✓Second ChamberComplete
✓GovernorComplete
6ChapteredCurrent
Last action: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 762, Statutes of 2026. (2026-09-29)Alert me
Recent actions30 total · showing 5
Sep. 29, 2026Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 762, Statutes of 2026.
Sep. 29, 2026Approved by the Governor.
Aug. 28, 2026Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
Aug. 24, 2026Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6402.).
Aug. 20, 2026In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Full action history, 25 earlier actionsConnect Plus
Latest bill textChaptered version, September 29, 2026 · 438 words

Assembly Bill No. 1749
CHAPTER 762

An act to add Section 1714.57 to the Civil Code, relating to civil law.

[ Approved by Governor September 29, 2026. Filed with Secretary of State September 29, 2026. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1749, Dixon. Interfering with wildfire suppression and emergency responses with drone.
Existing law makes it a crime for a person to operate or use an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote-piloted aircraft, or drone at the scene of an emergency for the purpose of viewing the scene or emergency or military personnel, and thereby impede the emergency or military personnel, in the performance of their duties in coping with the emergency. Existing law excuses a local public entity or public employee from liability for damage to an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, if the damage was caused while the local public entity or public employee of a local public entity was providing, and the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system was interfering with, the operation, support, or enabling of any emergency service, as specified. Existing law makes everyone responsible for an injury occasioned to another by their want of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property or person, as provided.
This bill would prohibit a person from operating or using an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote-piloted aircraft, or drone to knowingly or recklessly interfere with, among other things, a wildfire suppression or law enforcement or emergency response efforts related to a wildfire suppression. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a county counsel or city attorney to bring civil action to enforce the prohibition and authorize a prevailing plaintiff to recover civil penalties, injunctive relief, or reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, as specified.
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

Section 1714.57 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

1714.57.

(a) A person shall not operate or use an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote-piloted aircraft, or drone to knowingly or recklessly interfere with either of the following:
(1) A wildfire suppression, or law enforcement or emergency response efforts related to a wildfire suppression.
(2) An emergency response related to an incident for which a temporary flight restriction has been issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.
(b) The Attorney General or a county counsel or city attorney may bring a civil action to enforce subdivision (a). The prevailing plaintiff in an action may recover any of the following in any court of competent jurisdiction:
(1) A civil penalty not exceeding seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) for each violation.
(2) Injunctive relief.
(3) Reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

Text of AB 1749 as chaptered, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions
GovBuddy Demo

See how GovBuddy fits your team.

Share a few details and our team will follow up with a focused walkthrough.