26039.3.
(a) (1) If the department finds or has probable cause to believe that cannabis or a cannabis product is adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of this division, or the sale of the cannabis or cannabis product would be in violation of this division, the department shall affix to the cannabis or cannabis product, or component thereof, a tag or other appropriate marking.
(2) (A) The department shall provide written notice to the licensee that the cannabis or cannabis product is, or is suspected of being, adulterated or misbranded or the sale of the cannabis or cannabis product would be in violation of this division and has been embargoed and that the cannabis or cannabis product shall not be removed or disposed of by sale or otherwise until permission for removal or disposal is given by the department or a court.
(B) The notice shall be accompanied by clear, articulable facts and evidentiary documentation supporting the department’s legal basis for the embargo, which may include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(i) The specific section or subdivision of code or regulation alleged to be violated.
(ii) A copy of the laboratory certificate of analysis and testing data, if applicable.
(iii) Sampling methodology documentation.
(iv) A detailed description of the sampling procedure.
(v) Any photographic, electronic, or other evidence, if applicable.
(vi) A summary of the evidence supporting the finding of adulteration or misbranding.
(C) The department shall send the notice to the licensee within five calendar days of the tag or marking being placed on a product.
(b) (1) It is unlawful to remove, sell, or dispose of embargoed cannabis or an embargoed cannabis product without written permission of the department or a court. The removal, sale, or disposal of each item of embargoed cannabis or cannabis product without written permission of the department constitutes a violation of this subdivision. A violation of this subdivision is subject to a citation and fine of not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a licensed cultivator may request permission for the continued cultivation or harvesting of the cannabis subject to embargo. The department may authorize, and may impose conditions on, the continued cultivation or harvesting of the cannabis subject to embargo.
(c) If the adulteration or misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling or additional processing of the cannabis or cannabis product and all of the provisions of this division can be complied with, the licensee may request that the department remove the tag or other marking to permit correction. If, under the supervision of the department, the adulteration or misbranding has been corrected, the department may remove the tag or other marking. Cannabis and cannabis products found at an unlicensed location, or cultivated, processed, produced, or manufactured at an unlicensed location, or derived from an unlicensed source, shall not be corrected and shall be destroyed.
(d) (1) For any cannabis or a cannabis product that is embargoed, the department shall provide the licensee with an opportunity for an informal conference on the matter within 15 calendar days of the delivery of the notification required by paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). The informal conference shall include department personnel with knowledge of the matter and shall provide the licensee with an opportunity to present information and argument as to why the cannabis or cannabis product is not adulterated or misbranded, and is not otherwise in violation of this division.
(2) The department shall, within 15 calendar days from the date of the informal conference, make a final determination on whether or not the cannabis or cannabis product is adulterated or misbranded, or the sale of the cannabis or cannabis product would be in violation of this division.
(3) If the department finds that cannabis or a cannabis product that is embargoed is not adulterated or misbranded, or that its sale is not otherwise in violation of this division, the department shall remove the tag or other marking within five calendar days of that determination.
(e) The cannabis or cannabis product may be destroyed or remediated by the licensee or product owner pursuant to a corrective action plan approved by the department and under the supervision of the department. If destroyed, the cannabis or cannabis product shall be destroyed at the expense of the licensee or product owner.
(f) (1) (A) The department may condemn cannabis or a cannabis product under the provisions of this section.
(B) If the department does not approve the corrective action plan, or the department does not receive a response from the licensee within seven calendar days after providing the notice described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a), the department may initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(C) A petition for condemnation shall be subject to appropriate notice to, and the opportunity for a hearing with regard to, the person or licensee affected in accordance with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 11500) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(i) For cultivation licensees, the petition for condemnation shall be filed and served no later than 15 days after the department’s decision to deny the corrective action plan or, if the department does not receive a response from the licensee within 7 calendar days of the notice of the embargo, within 15 days from the expiration of that time period, whichever is later. The cultivation licensee shall be given at least 15 days’ notice of the hearing on the petition for a condemnation order, and an expedited hearing shall be scheduled. The notice shall include documents submitted in support of the petition.
(ii) Manufacturer and retailer licensees are not entitled to an expedited hearing process for a petition for condemnation.
(2) A decision on the petition shall be rendered no later than 10 days after submission of the matter.
(3) Notwithstanding Section 11502 of the Government Code, the department or an administrative law judge sitting alone may, upon petition, issue an order condemning cannabis or cannabis products. The department may, in its sole discretion, delegate the hearing to an administrative law judge in the Office of Administrative Hearings. If the department hears the noticed petition itself, an administrative law judge shall preside at the hearing, rule on the admission and exclusion of evidence, and advise the department on matters of law. The department shall exercise all other powers relating to the conduct of the hearing but may delegate any or all of them to the administrative law judge. When the petition has been delegated to an administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall sit alone and exercise all of the powers of the department relating to the conduct of the hearing. A decision issued by an administrative law judge sitting alone shall be final when it is filed with the department. The decision of the administrative law judge sitting alone on the petition for a condemnation order is final, subject only to review in accordance with subdivision (h).
(4) Upon a finding by the department or an administrative law judge pursuant to paragraph (3) that the cannabis or cannabis product is adulterated or misbranded, or that its sale is otherwise in violation of this division, the department or the administrative law judge may direct the cannabis or cannabis product to be destroyed at the expense of the licensee and under the supervision of the department. The licensee shall pay fees and reasonable costs, including the costs of storage, testing, and supervision, incurred by the department in investigating and prosecuting the action taken pursuant to this section.
(5) Upon a finding by the department or an administrative law judge pursuant to paragraph (3) that the adulteration or misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling or additional processing of the cannabis or cannabis product and that all provisions of this division can be complied with, the department or the administrative law judge may direct the cannabis or cannabis products to be brought into compliance under the department’s supervision. The licensee shall pay fees and reasonable costs, including the costs of storage, testing, and supervision, incurred by the department in investigating and prosecuting the action. After the costs, fees, and expenses have been paid, the department may release the embargo and remove the tag or other marking and supervise the corrective action.
(g) (1) The department shall not require a licensee to sign a waiver of liability, or to waive any right to an informal meeting or an administrative or judicial hearing or appeal, as a condition of removing an embargo tag, approving a corrective action plan, or permitting the destruction of product.
(2) A waiver of liability or appeal rights shall only be valid if the licensee agrees to a voluntary condemnation and destruction of the cannabis or cannabis products or if the waiver is executed following the conclusion of a condemnation proceeding pursuant to this section or civil litigation regarding the matter.
(3) Failure to comply with a condemnation order shall constitute a separate cause for disciplinary action against a licensee. Violation of the condemnation order is established upon proof that the licensee was on notice of the condemnation order and its terms, and that the order was in effect at the time of the violation.
(h) Condemnation orders shall be subject to review by the Cannabis Control Appeals Panel pursuant to Section 26043. The review of a condemnation order shall be limited to a determination of whether the department abused its discretion in the issuance of the condemnation order. Abuse of discretion is established if the respondent department has not proceeded in the manner required by law, or if the panel determines that the condemnation order is not supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.