Election 2026

The November 3 election will reshape legislatures. Stay current on every seat, staff, and committee change with GovBuddy.

Stay Current
Home/Bills/AB 1978California · 2025–2026 Regular Session
Assembly BillIntroducedFamily

AB 1978: California Equal Shared Parenting Act.

California · Assembly · 2025–2026 Regular Session · last verified March 3, 2026

What AB 1978 does, verified March 3, 2026

This bill aims to establish a rebuttable presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interest of the child if both parents are deemed fit, willing, and able to parent, and reside within 25 miles of the child's primary school or educational institution. The court can deny equal parenting time if it finds clear and convincing evidence that shared parenting time is not in the child's interest due to circumstances detrimental to the child, such as a history of domestic abuse. The decision to deny equal parenting time must be substantiated in writing and based on the evidence relied upon.

Bill journey
1IntroducedCurrent
2In CommitteePending
3First Chamber FloorPending
4Second ChamberPending
5GovernorPending
6ChapteredPending
Last action: Referred to Com. on JUD. (2026-03-02)Alert me
Recent actions3 total · showing 3
Mar. 02, 2026Referred to Com. on JUD.
Feb. 14, 2026From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
Feb. 13, 2026Read first time. To print.
Latest bill textIntroduced version, February 13, 2026 · 676 words


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 1978


Introduced by Assembly Member Johnson

February 13, 2026


An act to add Section 3040.1 of the Family Code, relating to family law.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 1978, as introduced, Johnson. California Equal Shared Parenting Act.
Existing law provides that it is the public policy of this state to ensure that children have frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have ended their relationship, and to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy, except where the contact would not be in the best interest of the child, as specified. Existing law provides for proceedings to determine the custody of a child, and establishes a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint custody is in the best interest of a minor child, as specified.
This bill would, for child custody proceedings filed on or after January 1, 2027, establish a rebuttable presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interest of the child if (1) both parents are found fit, willing, and able to parent and (2) both parents reside within 25 miles of the child’s primary school or educational institution. The bill would authorize the court to deny equal parenting time if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that shared parenting time is not in the interest of the child due to circumstances that are detrimental to the child, including, but not limited to, a history of substantiated domestic abuse. The bill would require any decision to deny equal parenting time to be substantiated in writing and specify the evidence relied upon.
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the California Equal Shared Parenting Act.
California Equal Shared Parenting Act

SEC. 2.

The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(a) The policy of the State of California is to assure children frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage.
(b) Children benefit from equal parenting time with both fit parents, provided it is practical and safe.
(c) Equal parenting time minimizes conflict, reduces litigation, and promotes a cooperative parenting environment.
(d) Establishing a rebuttable presumption of equal parenting time provides predictability, fairness, and supports the child’s right to a full relationship with both parents.

SEC. 3.

Section 3040.1 is added to the Family Code, to read:

3040.1.

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, in any proceeding under this part involving the right to custody of a minor child, there is a rebuttable presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interest of the child if all of the following apply:
(1) Both parents are found to be fit, willing, and able to parent.
(2) Both parents reside within 25 miles of the child’s primary school or educational institution.
(b) The presumption may be rebutted only by clear and convincing evidence that equal parenting time is not in the best interest of the child due to circumstances that are detrimental to the child, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(1) A history of substantiated domestic violence, child abuse, or neglect.
(2) A pattern of substance abuse or mental illness impairing parental capacity.
(3) A demonstrated refusal to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
(4) Logistical barriers that make equal time impractical due to distance or inflexibility.
(c) Any decision to deny equal parenting time pursuant to this section shall be made in writing by the court and specify the evidence relied upon and the reasons equal parenting time is not in the child’s best interest.
(d) “Equal parenting time” means a substantially equal division of custodial overnights throughout the year, allowing reasonable adjustments for school schedules, holidays, and special circumstances, provided each parent receives no less than 45 percent of overnights annually.
(e) This section shall apply to all child custody proceedings filed on or after January 1, 2027.

Text of AB 1978 as introduced, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions
GovBuddy Demo

See how GovBuddy fits your team.

Share a few details and our team will follow up with a focused walkthrough.