SB 1016: Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program and court-ordered evaluations.
This bill aims to expand the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) court program, which provides behavioral health services to adults with severe mental illnesses. The program allows for court-ordered evaluations under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS Act) if a petitioner believes the respondent may not be willing or able to participate due to their mental disorder or lack of insight. The court can issue an order for a mental health evaluation if probable cause is established. The bill also requires counties to provide a higher level of service for this program. Additionally, the bill includes technical changes and makes other conforming adjustments.
| Aug. 13, 2026 | August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission. |
| Aug. 05, 2026 | August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file. |
| Jul. 02, 2026 | Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| Jul. 01, 2026 | From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 30). |
| Jun. 16, 2026 | Coauthors revised. |
| Amended IN Assembly July 02, 2026 |
| Amended IN Senate May 14, 2026 |
| Amended IN Senate April 28, 2026 |
| Amended IN Senate March 26, 2026 |
| Amended IN Senate March 25, 2026 |
| Introduced by Senator Blakespear (Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg) |
February 10, 2026 |
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
This bill would, among other things, authorize a petitioner of a CARE Act petition to request that the court order a mental health evaluation under the LPS Act if the petitioner believes that the person may not be willing or able to participate in the CARE process and a CARE plan or CARE agreement due to the severity of their mental disorder or lack of insight into their mental disorder, and would require the Judicial Council to include on the mandatory petition form an option for the petitioner to request that evaluation. The bill would authorize the court to issue an order for a mental health evaluation under the LPS Act if the CARE Act petition or report prepared by the county behavioral health agency establishes probable cause to support the evaluation and the respondent will not voluntarily receive crisis intervention services or an evaluation, as specified. The bill would also make other technical, conforming changes. By expanding the crime of perjury and imposing a higher level of service on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a)Whenever it appears, by petition pursuant to this article or by the process pursuant to the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment Act (Part 8 (commencing with Section 5970)) to the satisfaction of a superior court that there is probable cause that a person is, as a result of mental disorder, a danger to others, or to themselves, or gravely disabled, and the person has refused or failed to accept evaluation voluntarily, the court shall issue an order notifying the person to submit to an evaluation at the time and place that is designated by the court. The order for an evaluation shall be served, as provided in Section 5208, by a peace officer, counselor in mental health, behavioral health professional, or a court-appointed official. The person shall be permitted to remain in their home or other place of their choosing prior to the time of evaluation, and shall be permitted to be accompanied by one or more of their relatives, friends, an attorney, a personal physician, or other professional or religious advisor to the place of evaluation. If the person to receive evaluation requests, the individuals who accompany the person may be present during the evaluation.
(b)If the person refuses or fails to appear for evaluation after having been properly notified, a peace officer, counselor in mental health, or a court-appointed official shall initiate an involuntary hold and place them in a facility designated by the county as a facility for treatment and evaluation. The person shall be evaluated as promptly as possible, and shall in no event be detained longer than 72 hours under the court order, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays if treatment and evaluation services are not available on those days.
(c)A person who has been detained for evaluation shall be released, referred for care and treatment on a voluntary basis, certified for intensive treatment, or recommended for conservatorship pursuant to this part, as required.
SEC. 2.SECTION 1.
5207.
The order for evaluation shall be in substantially the following form:In the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of _____ | |
The People of the State of California Concerning and _____ Respondents _____ | No. _____ Order for Evaluation or Detention |
The People of the State of California to | |
: | |
(Peace officer, counselor in mental health, behavioral health professional, or other official appointed by the court) | |
_____ Judge of the Superior Court _____ |
_____ Signature and Title _____ |
SEC. 3.SEC. 2.
5211.
The report of a patient’s property required by Section 5210 to be made by the person taking the patient into custody for evaluation shall be in substantially the following form:Dated: ____ 20__ | |
_____ Signature and Title _____ |
The Judicial Council shall develop a mandatory form for use to file a CARE process petition with the court and any other forms necessary for the CARE process. The petition shall be signed under the penalty of perjury and contain all of the following:
(a)The name of the respondent and, if known, the respondent’s address.
(b)The petitioner’s relationship to the respondent.
(c)Facts that support the petitioner’s assertion that the respondent meets the CARE criteria in Section 5972.
(d)Either of the following:
(1)An affidavit of a licensed behavioral health professional, including, for purposes of this section only, nurse practitioners as defined in Section 2835 of the Business and Professions Code and physician assistants as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 3501 of the Business and Professions Code, stating that the licensed behavioral health professional or their designee has examined the respondent within 60 days of the submission of the petition, or has made multiple attempts to examine, but has not been successful in eliciting the cooperation of the respondent to submit to an examination, within 60 days of the petition, and that the licensed behavioral health professional had determined that the respondent meets, or has reason to believe, explained with specificity in the affidavit, that the respondent meets the diagnostic criteria for CARE proceedings.
(2)Evidence that the respondent was detained for a minimum of two intensive treatments pursuant to Article 4 (commencing with Section 5250) of Chapter 2 of Part 1, the most recent one within the previous 60 days. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, documentary evidence from the facility where the respondent was detained, or a signed declaration from the petitioner if the petitioner had personal knowledge of the detentions.
(e)(1)If the petitioner believes that the person otherwise meets the CARE criteria but may not be willing or able to participate in the CARE process and a CARE plan or CARE agreement due to the severity of their mental disorder or lack of insight into their mental disorder, the petitioner may request that the court order a mental health evaluation under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 if the CARE petition is dismissed.
(2)The Judicial Council shall include on the mandatory petition form an option for the petitioner to request the court to order a mental health evaluation under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 upon dismissal of the petition if the respondent is not willing or able to participate in the CARE process and a CARE plan or CARE agreement due to the severity of their mental disorder or lack of insight into their mental disorder.
(3)The Judicial Council shall amend the notice of dismissal form to include a section to indicate whether the court has ordered, pursuant to Section 5977, a mental health evaluation under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 upon the dismissal, and the indication on the dismissal form shall concurrently serve as that court order for the mental health evaluation.
SEC. 5.SEC. 3.
5976.5.
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, and except as otherwise provided in this section, a hearing held under this part is presumptively closed to the public.SEC. 6.SEC. 4.
5977.
(a) (1) The court shall promptly review the petition to determine if the petitioner has made a prima facie showing that the respondent is, or may be, a person described in Section 5972. The court may make a prima facie determination without conducting a hearing.(V)Whether there is probable cause to believe that the respondent is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to themselves or others, or gravely disabled as defined in Section 5008, and whether the respondent will agree voluntarily to receive crisis intervention services or an evaluation in their own home or in a facility designated by the county and approved by the State Department of Health Care Services.
(v)If the court determines that the petition, the report submitted pursuant to clause (iii), or both, establish that there is probable cause to believe that the respondent is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to themselves or others, or gravely disabled as defined in Section 5008, and that the respondent will not voluntarily receive crisis intervention services or an evaluation, the court shall issue an order notifying the respondent to submit to an evaluation as specified in Section 5206.
(v)Conclusions about whether the respondent may need a higher level of care than is available under this part, and whether there is probable cause to believe that the respondent is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to themselves or others, or gravely disabled as defined in Section 5008, and whether the respondent will agree voluntarily to receive crisis intervention services or an evaluation in their own home or in a facility designated by the county and approved by the State Department of Health Care Services.
(vi)
(D)If the court determines, based on the county agency’s report submitted under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3), the petition, or both, that there is probable cause to believe that the respondent is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to themselves or others, or gravely disabled as defined in Section 5008, and that the respondent will not voluntarily receive evaluation, the court shall issue an order notifying the respondent to submit to an evaluation as specified in Section 5206.
SEC. 7.SEC. 5.
5977.4.
(a) In all CARE Act proceedings, the judicial officer shall control the proceedings during the hearings with a view to the expeditious and effective ascertainment of the jurisdictional facts and the ascertainment of all information relative to the present condition and future welfare of the respondent. Except when there is a contested issue of fact or law, the proceedings shall be conducted in an informal nonadversarial atmosphere with a view to obtaining the maximum cooperation of the respondent, all persons interested in the respondent’s welfare, and all other parties, with any provisions that the court may make for the disposition and care of the respondent. The court and relevant local public agencies shall cooperate to develop a comprehensive set of objectives established to improve performance of the CARE system in a vigorous and ongoing manner. The court is authorized to coordinate and participate in meetings to improve system performance. All evaluations and reports, documents, and filings submitted to the court pursuant to CARE Act proceedings shall be confidential.(a)(1)If, at any time during the proceedings, the court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is not participating in the CARE process, after the respondent receives notice, or is not adhering to their CARE plan, after the respondent receives notice, the court may terminate the respondent’s participation in the CARE process.
(2)To ensure the respondent’s safety, the court may utilize legal authority pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1. The court shall provide notice to the county behavioral health agency and the Office of the Public Conservator and Guardian if the court utilizes that authority.
(3)If the respondent was timely provided with all of the services and supports required by the CARE plan, the fact that the respondent failed to successfully complete their CARE plan, including reasons for that failure, shall be a fact considered by the court in a subsequent hearing under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1 (commencing with Section 5000)), provided that the hearing occurs within six months of the termination of the CARE plan and shall create a presumption at that hearing that the respondent needs additional intervention beyond the supports and services provided by the CARE plan.
(4)The respondent’s failure to comply with an order shall not result in a penalty outside of this section, including, but not limited to, contempt or a failure to appear.
(5)The respondent’s failure to comply with a medication order shall not result in any penalty, including under this section.
(b)(1)If, at any time during the CARE process, the court finds that the county or other local government entity is not complying with court orders, the court shall report that finding to the presiding judge of the superior court or their designee.
(2)(A)The presiding judge or their designee shall issue an order to show cause why the local government entity should not be fined as set forth in this section. The time set for hearing shall be no earlier than 15 days after the date of the order. The scheduled date of the hearing shall allow adequate time for notice of the hearing to be served upon the local government entity.
(B)The presiding judge, or their designee, shall consider the matter on the record established at the hearing. If the presiding judge or their designee finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the local government entity has substantially failed to comply with this part, or with lawful orders issued by a court under this part, the presiding judge or their designee may issue an order imposing a fine under this section.
(C)A fine under this section shall be in an amount of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day, not to exceed $25,000 for each individual violation identified in the order imposing fines.
(D)(i)Funds collected pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in the CARE Act Accountability Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Upon appropriation, the department shall administer the funds annually, and shall issue guidance, as necessary, to local government entities, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 5984, regarding the distribution and conditions associated with the administered funds.
(ii)All moneys in the fund shall be allocated and distributed to the local government entity that paid the fines, to be used by that entity to serve individuals who have schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders and who are experiencing, or are at risk of, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, hospitalization, or conservatorship.
(3)If, after notice and hearing as set forth in paragraph (2), the presiding judge or their designee finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the local government entity is persistently noncompliant with this part, or with lawful orders issued by a court under this part, the presiding judge or their designee may appoint a special master to secure court-ordered care for the respondent at the local government entity’s cost. The presiding judge, or their designee, shall not make an order under this paragraph unless they have received five or more reports under paragraph (1) pertaining to the same local government entity within a one-year period.
(4)In determining the application of the remedies available under this section, the court shall consider whether there are any mitigating circumstances impairing the ability of the local government entity to fully comply with the requirements of this part, or with court orders issued under this part. The court may consider whether the local government entity is making a good faith effort to come into substantial compliance or is facing substantial undue hardships.
(c)Either the respondent or the county behavioral health agency may appeal an adverse court determination.
SEC. 9.SEC. 6.
5983.
(a) The California Health and Human Services Agency, or a designated department within the agency, shall do both of the following:SEC. 10.SEC. 7.
5985.
(a) (1) The department shall develop, in consultation with county behavioral health agencies, other relevant state or local government entities, disability rights groups, individuals with lived experience, families, counsel, racial justice experts, and other appropriate stakeholders, an annual CARE Act report. The department shall post the annual report on its internet website.(F)The total number of court-ordered mental health evaluations under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 requested pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 5972.
(G)The total number of court-ordered mental health evaluations under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 ordered upon dismissal, the total number of cases dismissed where a court-ordered mental health evaluation under Article 2 (commencing with Section 5200) of Chapter 2 of Part 1 was requested, but not ordered, and the basis for dismissal in those cases.
SEC. 11.SEC. 8.