Home/Bills/SB 1243California · 2025–2026 Regular Session

Senate BillIntroducedCivil Procedure

SB 1243: Unlawful detainer: Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of 2026.

California · Senate · 2025–2026 Regular Session · last verified June 8, 2026

What SB 1243 does, verified June 8, 2026

This bill provides protections for immigrant families by temporarily halting eviction proceedings when immigration enforcement activities impact a tenant's income or financial support. Until January 1, 2030, a tenant can submit a declaration stating they experienced a hardship due to immigration enforcement activities, and the court will stay the eviction action if the tenant provides documentation. The landlord cannot charge late fees, interest, or penalties during this period. The bill also prohibits selling or assigning unpaid debts resulting from immigration enforcement activities and prohibits using these debts as a negative factor in evaluating housing applications.

Bill journey

1IntroducedCurrent

2In CommitteePending

3First Chamber FloorPending

4Second ChamberPending

5GovernorPending

6ChapteredPending

Last action: May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission. (2026-05-14)Alert me

Author and sponsors

Sen. Maria Elena DurazoAuthor · California State Senate

Full contact details, staff, and committees with Connect, $16/moUnlock

Recent actions15 total · showing 5

May. 14, 2026	May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
May. 12, 2026	Set for hearing May 14.
May. 11, 2026	May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
May. 04, 2026	Set for hearing May 11.
Apr. 29, 2026	Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Full action history, 10 earlier actionsConnect Plus

Latest bill textAmended version, April 28, 2026 · 2,063 words

Amended IN Senate April 28, 2026

Amended IN Senate April 08, 2026

Amended IN Senate March 25, 2026

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill

No. 1243

Introduced by Senator Durazo

February 19, 2026

An act to amend and repeal Sections 1785.20.4 and 1942.9 of, and to add and repeal Section 1946.6 of, the Civil Code, ~~and to amend, add, and repeal Section 1161 of,~~ and to add and repeal Section 1788.65 ~~of,~~ of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil actions.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

SB 1243, as amended, Durazo. Unlawful detainer: Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of 2026.

Existing law provides that a tenant is guilty of unlawful detainer if the tenant continues to possess the property without permission of the landlord after the tenant defaults on rent or fails to perform a condition or covenant of the lease under which the property is held, among other reasons. Existing law requires a tenant to be served a 3 days’ notice in writing to cure a default or perform a condition of the lease, or return possession of the property to the landlord, as specified.

This bill, the Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of ~~2026,~~ 2026 (Act), would, until January 1, 2030, prohibit an owner of residential real property, as defined, from initiating or continuing an unlawful detainer action to evict a tenant whose income, ability to obtain income, or financial support is impacted by immigration enforcement activities until 180 days after the conclusion of those immigration enforcement activities, as specified. The bill would require a tenant to submit a declaration of detention-related hardship to the owner that includes a specified statement in order for these protections to take effect. Any person who knowingly provides false information in the declaration would be subject to a civil fine of up to $1,500. no sooner than 90 days after the tenant or household member’s detention-related hardship ends, as specified. The bill would require a court to stay the proceeding of a pending unlawful detainer action against a covered tenant if certain conditions are satisfied, including that the tenant provides the court with ~~documentation~~ specified documentation, such as a signed declaration of detention-related hardship that includes a specified statement, that the tenant or household member suffered a detention-related hardship that prevented them from paying the unpaid rent alleged in the unlawful detainer action. Any person who knowingly provides false information in the declaration of detention-related hardship would be subject to a civil fine of up to $1,500. Under the bill, if a tenant has raised detention-related hardship as an affirmative defense, an owner of residential real property may request an evidentiary hearing regarding the tenant’s detention-related hardship stay of the unlawful detainer action, at which the tenant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence their detention-related hardship. The bill would prohibit the owner from charging or collecting any late fees, interest, or other penalties related to the nonpayment of rent by a tenant subject to these provisions. Within 90 days after the end of the detention-related hardship, the bill would require the tenant to either pay all past due rent or enter into a mutually agreed upon payment plan with the owner of the residential real property.

For purposes of the Act, this bill would define “immigration enforcement activities” to include any efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal immigration law, including any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry or reentry to, or employment in, the United States. The bill would define “detention-related hardship” to mean, among other things, loss of income or financial support by the tenant or household member due to immigration enforcement activities and the loss of income or increased costs or out-of-pocket expenses due to effects sustained by the tenant or household member from immigration enforcement activities. detention, arrest, or ordered removal of a tenant or household member by any federal law enforcement agency.

This bill would require a 3 days’ notice to cure a default or perform a condition of the lease, or return possession of the property to the landlord, to include a specified statement advising the tenant that they cannot be evicted for failure to comply with the notice if the tenant delivers a signed declaration of detention-related hardship to the landlord within 15 days.

This bill would prohibit a landlord from charging a tenant subject to these provisions fees assessed for the late payment of that rental debt. The bill would prohibit a person from selling or assigning any unpaid debt as a result of detention-related hardship. The bill would prohibit a housing provider or tenant screening company from using an alleged debt as a result of detention-related hardship as a negative factor for the purpose of evaluating a prospective housing application or as the basis for refusing to rent a dwelling unit to an otherwise qualified prospective tenant. The bill would delete similar provisions related to debts as a result of COVID-19 rental debt.

The bill would require the Judicial Council to review its existing forms and develop new forms to effectuate these provisions.

The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2030.

Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(a) California is home to more than 10 million immigrants, the nation’s largest by population and proportion, including nearly 2 million undocumented residents, who enrich our communities, strengthen our economy, and contribute to the cultural and social fabric of the Golden State.

(b) United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the United States Department of Homeland Security ~~(ICE) has~~ have targeted grocery stores, car washes, business vendors, construction sites, and garment factories in predominantly Latino communities.

(c) United States citizens, based on their skin color and appearance, have been unlawfully harassed, handcuffed, arrested, and deported.

(d) Californians have experienced and documented countless instances of federal agents targeting and harassing residents based on the color of their skin, regardless of immigration status.

(e) Since June 6, 2025, ICE, along with armed federal agents, has conducted military style immigration raids and arrests at work sites, homes, and public spaces, creating a climate of fear among immigrants dropping their children off at school, going to work, attending faith services, seeking medical or emergency services, or shopping for essential needs.

(f) Since June 6, 2025, over ~~10,000~~ 33,000 individuals have been arrested in the indiscriminate raids at work sites, homes, and public spaces across Southern California. Nationally, there are over ~~70,000~~ 131,000 individuals in detention, one of the highest numbers of detained individuals in our nation’s history. As a result, many residents are unable to move freely due to the threat of harassment, violence, and abduction, forcing them to shelter-in-place and impacting their ability to work, access critical medical care, and provide for their families.

(g) In addition to the threat of violence and abduction, many families are also grappling with the fear of eviction due to an inability to safely go to work.

(h) California immigrants are more likely to be rent burdened than their native-born counterparts. Undocumented renters of multi-unit housing spend an additional seven hundred dollars ($700) on housing per year because of their undocumented status.

(i) In 2023, 62 percent of undocumented renters in California were burdened by housing costs compared with 57 percent for all California immigrant renters. Thirty-one percent of all immigrant renters and 34 percent of undocumented renters were severely rent burdened, paying more than 50 percent of their household income on rent.

(j) In addition to deportations, ICE raids drive “widespread income loss, housing insecurity, and the looming threat of mass displacement” for California’s immigrant renters.

(k) Los Angeles County immigrant renters’ average weekly earnings fell from seven hundred ninety-nine dollars and twenty-five cents ($799.25) before the raids to three hundred four dollars and fifty-seven cents ($304.57) afterward, a 62 percent drop. Since the raids, renters reported spending 91 percent of their income on rent, on average, putting them at dire risk of eviction.

SEC. 2.

Section 1942.9 of the Civil Code is amended to read:

1942.9.

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, a landlord shall not, with respect to a tenant who has rental debt as a result of detention-related hardship, as that term is defined in Section 1946.6 of the Civil Code, do either of the following:

(1) Charge a tenant, or attempt to collect from a tenant, fees assessed for the late payment of that rental debt.

(2) Increase fees charged to the tenant or charge the tenant fees for services previously provided by the landlord without charge.

(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2030, and as of that date is repealed.

SEC. 3.

Section 1946.6 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

1946.6.

(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Tenant Protections for Immigrant Families Act of 2026.

(b) For purposes of this section:

(1) “Covered tenant” means a person who lives in California and whose income, ability to obtain income, or financial support, is impacted by immigration enforcement activities.

~~(2)“Covered time period” means 180 days after the conclusion of immigration enforcement activities that caused the detention-related hardship.~~

~~(3)~~

(2)
“Detention-related hardship” means ~~any of the following:~~ the loss of income or financial support by the tenant or household member due to detention, arrest, or ordered removal of a tenant or household member by any federal law enforcement agency.

~~(A)The loss of income or financial support by the tenant or household member due to immigration enforcement activities.~~
~~(B)The loss of income or increased costs or out-of-pocket expenses due to effects sustained by the tenant or household member from immigration enforcement activities.~~
(C)The loss of income due to reduced hours or closure of the workplace in which the tenant or household member works, including loss of self-employment income, in direct response to immigration enforcement activities, including increased presence or raids conducted by immigration enforcement authorities.
~~(D)Increased costs or out-of-pocket expenses for childcare to care for children whose parents or guardians have been transferred to a detention facility or barred from reentry into the United States.~~
~~(E)Increased costs or out-of-pocket expenses for attending to a family member who was injured as a result of immigration enforcement activities.~~
~~(F)Other circumstances related to immigration enforcement activities that have reduced a tenant’s income or increased a tenant’s expenses.~~
~~(4)~~
(3)
“Household member” means a member of the tenant’s household who lives in the same residential unit as the tenant.

~~(5)~~
(4)
“Immigration enforcement activities” includes all of the following:

(A) Any efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal immigration law, including any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry or reentry to, or employment in, the United States.

(B) The detention, arrest, or removal of any person by any federal law enforcement agency, regardless of the individual’s immigration status or United States citizenship status, whether naturalized or born in the United States, during an immigration enforcement action.

~~(C)The increased presence of raids conducted by immigration enforcement authorities.~~
~~(6)~~
(5)
“Owner” includes any person, acting as principal or through an agent, having the right to offer residential real property for rent, including a predecessor in interest to the owner, and includes the owner or operator of a mobilehome park or their agent.

~~(7)~~
(6)
“Residential real property” means any dwelling or unit that is intended for human habitation, including any dwelling or unit in a mobilehome park.

(1)An owner shall not initiate or continue an unlawful detainer action pursuant to Section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure to evict a covered tenant that complies with the requirements of subdivision (e) for nonpayment of rent for the duration of the covered period.
(2)If the conditions listed in subdivision (f) are satisfied in a pending unlawful detainer action against a covered tenant, the court shall stay the proceedings if the covered tenant’s ability to pay rent is affected by detention-related hardships.
~~(3)~~
(1)
An owner shall not charge or collect any late fees, interest, or other penalties related to the nonpayment of rent by a covered tenant during the covered time period.

Text of SB 1243 as amended, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions