Assembly BillIntroduced
A 10689: Adds Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake in Putnam county to the definition of inland waterways.
What A 10689 does, verified June 9, 2026
The proposed legislation aims to add two lakes, Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake, to the definition of inland waterways in New York State. These lakes are located in Putnam County and would be included in the state's existing list of major inland lakes. The addition of these lakes would allow for more specific regulations and protections to be put in place to conserve and protect these waterways. The changes would take effect immediately.
Bill journey
1IntroducedCurrent
2In CommitteePending
3First Chamber FloorPending
4Second ChamberPending
5GovernorPending
6ChapteredPending
Last action: substituted by s9506 (2026-06-05)Alert me
Quick answers about A 10689
- What is the current status of A 10689?
- As of June 9, 2026, A 10689 is recorded as "Introduced": it has been introduced and is waiting for its first committee hearing or floor vote. The last recorded action, on June 5, 2026, was "substituted by s9506".
- Did A 10689 pass?
- Not yet. A 10689 has been introduced and has not passed either house.
- Who wrote A 10689, and where is it now?
- A 10689 was authored by Asm. Matthew Slater.
Author and sponsors
Full contact details, staff, and committees with Connect, $16/moUnlockRecent actions7 total · showing 5
| Jun. 05, 2026 | substituted by s9506 |
| Jun. 05, 2026 | ordered to third reading rules cal.586 |
| Jun. 05, 2026 | rules report cal.586 |
| Jun. 05, 2026 | reported |
| Jun. 04, 2026 | reported referred to rules |
Latest bill textIntroduced version, March 20, 2026 · 327 words
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 10689 IN ASSEMBLY March 20, 2026 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. SLATER -- read once and referred to the Committee on Environmental Conservation AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to adding Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake in Putnam county to the definition of inland waterways The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 911 of the execu- 2 tive law, as separately amended by chapters 253, 313 and 340 of the laws 3 of 2022, is amended to read as follows: 4 (a) the state's major inland lakes consisting of lakes Baldwin, Ball- 5 ston, Big Tupper, Black, Brant, Campfire, Canadarago, Canandaigua, 6 Carmel, Casse, Cazenovia, Cayuga, Champlain, Charles, Chateaugay, Chau- 7 tauqua, Chazy, Conesus, Cranberry, Dean Pond (in the county of Putnam), 8 Drew, East Caroga, Dickiebusch, Echo (in the county of Westchester), 9 George, Gilead, Glencoma, Great Sacandaga, Honeoye, Indian, Journeys 10 End, Junior (in the county of Westchester), Furnace Brook, Katonah, 11 Kentwood, Keuka, Kirk, Kitchawan, Little Wolf (in the county of Frank- 12 lin), Lincolndale, Long, Lost (in the county of Putnam), Meahagh, 13 Mirror, MacGregor, Mahopac, Minerva, Mohegan, Nimham, Neatahwanta, 14 Northville, Oceola, Oneida, Onondaga, Oscaleta, Oscawana, Ossi, Otisco, 15 Otsego, Owasco, Palmer, Paradox, Peach, Peekskill, Placid, Purdys, 16 Putnam, Raquette, Rippowam, Roaring Brook, Ronkonkoma, Round, Sacandaga, 17 Saratoga, Schroon, Secor, Seneca, Shenorock, Skaneateles, Silver (in the 18 county of Wyoming), Sagamore, Saranac, Seven Hills, Simon (in the county 19 of Franklin), Sparkle, Tibet, Tonetta, Teakettle Spout, Truesdale, 20 Waccabuc, West Caroga, White (in the county of Sullivan) and Wixon, and 21 the Fulton chain of lakes; 22 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD15205-01-6
Text of A 10689 as introduced, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions