A 8156: Requires the commissioner to incorporate measures of racial and socioeconomic integration into state accountability models; requires data compiled to be included in the school report card created by the department.
The proposed legislation aims to incorporate measures of racial and socioeconomic integration into state accountability models. The state will establish a proportionality score for each school, which compares the demographic profiles of each school to the county in which it is located. This score will be used to measure the degree of racial and economic segregation in each county. Schools will receive designations of "highly proportional," "proportional," "somewhat disproportional," or "highly disproportional" based on their proportionality score. Additionally, schools will be required to report measures of equality of access for certain student subgroups, including historically underserved student subgroups. The data calculated will be reported separately on the annual school report card, allowing for easy comparison of school-level and county-level data. The report card will also indi…
- What is the current status of A 8156?
- As of January 9, 2026, A 8156 is recorded as "Introduced": it has been introduced and is waiting for its first committee hearing or floor vote. The last recorded action, on January 7, 2026, was "referred to education".
- Did A 8156 pass?
- Not yet. A 8156 has been introduced and has not passed either house.
- Who wrote A 8156, and where is it now?
- A 8156 was authored by Asm. Jessica González-Rojas with 3 coauthors. Its committee of record is Assembly Education.
| Jan. 07, 2026 | referred to education |
| May. 02, 2025 | referred to education |
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 8156 2025-2026 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY May 2, 2025 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. GONZALEZ-ROJAS, CLARK, KELLES, SIMON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to incorporating measures of racial and socioeconomic integration into state accountability models The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature finds and declares all 2 of the following: 3 (a) The U.S. Supreme Court has declared that school diversity and the 4 reduction of racial isolation are compelling government interests. 5 (b) Racial and socioeconomic isolation in schools affects students' 6 ability to access experienced and qualified teachers, advanced course- 7 work, high-quality instructional materials, and adequate facilities on 8 an equitable basis. 9 (c) Decades of research have found that racial and socioeconomic inte- 10 gration of schools benefits all students. 11 (d) The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. § 12 6301, et seq., as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act, P.L. 114-95 13 requires state accountability systems to include an indicator of school 14 quality or student success which must meaningfully differentiate among 15 schools and be valid, reliable, and comparable statewide. 16 The legislature thereby establishes this act to include measures of 17 racial and socioeconomic integration and equality of access in annual 18 school report cards. 19 § 2. Section 305 of the education law is amended by adding a new 20 subdivision 57 to read as follows: 21 57. The commissioner shall establish measures incorporating inte- 22 gration into state accountability models. Such measures shall include: 23 a. Calculation of a school proportionality score. For each school, the 24 department shall calculate a proportionality score that compares the 25 demographic profiles of each school to the demographic profile of the 26 county in which the school is located in order to measure the degree of 27 racial and economic segregation in each county and the degree of EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD08619-01-5A. 8156 2 1 progress being made over time toward greater diversity. The department 2 shall calculate the proportionality score for each school as follows: 3 (i) Multiply the proportion of the first subgroup found in the county 4 times the total population of the school; 5 (ii) Subtract from the product calculated pursuant to subparagraph (i) 6 of this paragraph the population of the first subgroup in the school; 7 (iii) Convert the number calculated in subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of 8 this paragraph to an absolute value; 9 (iv) Repeat the steps in subparagraphs (i) through (iii) of this para- 10 graph for every identified subgroup and sum the values; 11 (v) Divide by an amount equal to the total number of students in the 12 school multiplied by two. 13 b. Reporting of the school proportionality score. A school shall 14 receive a designation of "highly proportional" if their proportionality 15 score is less than ten percent. The school shall receive a designation 16 of "proportional" if their proportionality score is between ten percent 17 and less than twenty-five percent. The school shall receive a desig- 18 nation of "somewhat disproportional" if their proportionality score is 19 between twenty-five percent and less than fifty percent. The school 20 shall receive a designation of "highly disproportional" if their propor- 21 tionality score is fifty percent or above. 22 c. Measures of equality of access for certain subgroups of students 23 served by a school. In addition to the overall school performance scores 24 and grades awarded under this subdivision, for each school that serves 25 any historically underserved student subgroup comprising at least five 26 percent of the school's student population, the department shall calcu- 27 late measures of equality of access which demonstrate the extent to 28 which each school's population of historically underserved student 29 subgroups has access to school resources associated with high educa- 30 tional achievement. 31 For each racial or ethnic subgroup within a school and for econom- 32 ically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students, the 33 department shall calculate each subgroup's participation in or exposure 34 to: 35 (i) Gifted and talented programs or advanced courses; 36 (ii) Teachers with at least three years of experience; and 37 (iii) Teachers with certification from the national board for profes- 38 sional teaching standards. 39 For each school, each racial or ethnic subgroup within a county, and 40 economically disadvantaged and non-economically disadvantaged students 41 in the county, the department shall calculate the school or subgroup's 42 average: 43 (A) Number of field trips; 44 (B) Hours of instruction in arts or music; 45 (C) School-level ratio of students to psychologists; 46 (D) School-level ratio of students to guidance counselors; 47 (E) School-level ratio of students to nurses; and 48 (F) School-level ratio of students to media specialists. 49 d. Reporting. The data calculated in paragraphs b and c of this subdi- 50 vision shall be reported separately on the annual school report card in 51 a way that allows for easy comparison of school-level and county-level 52 data. The school report card shall also indicate whether each school is 53 making progress towards reducing school segregation and providing 54 students with equality of access to school resources associated with 55 high educational achievement. 56 § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.