S 3827: Prohibits the use of biometric identifying technology in schools for any reason other than certain specified purposes; adds fingerprint identification of teachers, administrators and students for the purpose of securely logging into a digital device for academic and administrative purpose to allowable purposes.

  
  STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 3827 2025-2026 Regular Sessions  IN SENATE January 30, 2025 ___________ Introduced by Sens. HOYLMAN-SIGAL, SALAZAR -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Internet and Technology AN ACT to amend the state technology law, in relation to banning the use of biometric identifying technology in schools The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Subdivisions 2, 3 and 4 of section 106-b of the state tech- 2 nology law, as added by chapter 2 of the laws of 2021, are amended to 3 read as follows: 4 2. a. Except as authorized in paragraph b of this subdivision, public 5 and nonpublic elementary and secondary schools, including charter 6 schools, shall be prohibited from purchasing or utilizing biometric 7 identifying technology for any purpose, including school security[, 8 until July first, two thousand twenty-two or until the commissioner of 9 education authorizes such purchase or utilization as provided in subdi- 10 vision three of this section, whichever occurs later]. 11 b. Schools may utilize biometric identifying technology for the 12 following purposes: (i) fingerprint identification of prospective school 13 employees where utilized for the purpose of compliance with a provision 14 of the education law or the regulations of the commissioner of education 15 or (ii) to exclusively identify employees that have consented in writing 16 to the use of such technology or in the case of employees represented 17 under article fourteen of the civil service law, where the employee 18 organization representing such employee has consented in writing to the 19 use of such technology. 20 [3. a. The commissioner of education shall not authorize the purchase 21 or utilization of biometric identifying technology, including but not 22 limited to facial recognition technology, without the director first 23 issuing a report prepared in consultation with the state education 24 department, making recommendations as to the circumstances in which the EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD07150-01-5 
 S. 3827 2 1 utilization of such technology is appropriate in public and nonpublic 2 elementary and secondary schools, including charter schools, and what 3 restrictions and guidelines should be enacted to protect individual 4 privacy, civil rights, and civil liberty interests. Such report shall be 5 made public and presented to the governor, the temporary president of 6 the senate, and the speaker of the assembly, and shall consider, evalu- 7 ate and present recommendations concerning: 8 i. the privacy implications of collecting, storing, and/or sharing 9 biometric information of students, teachers, school personnel and the 10 general public entering a school or school grounds; 11 ii. the potential impact of the use of biometric identifying technolo- 12 gy on student civil liberties and student civil rights, including the 13 risks and implications of the technology resulting in false facial iden- 14 tifications, and whether the risks of false facial identifications 15 differs for different subgroups of individuals based on race, national 16 origin, gender, age and other factors, and any other reasonable accuracy 17 concerns with respect to technology; 18 iii. whether, and under what circumstances, such technology may be 19 used for school security and the effectiveness of such technology to 20 protect students and school personnel; 21 iv. whether, and under what circumstances and in what manner, informa- 22 tion collected may be used by schools and shared with students, parents 23 or guardians, outside agencies including law enforcement agencies, indi- 24 viduals, litigants, the courts, and any other third parties; 25 v. the length of time biometric information may be retained and wheth- 26 er, and in what manner, such information may be required to be perma- 27 nently destroyed; 28 vi. the risk of an unauthorized breach of biometric information and 29 appropriate consequences therefor; 30 vii. expected maintenance costs resulting from the storage and use of 31 facial recognition images and other biometric information, including the 32 cost of appropriately securing sensitive data, performing required 33 updates to protect against an unauthorized breach of data, and potential 34 costs associated with an unauthorized breach of data; 35 viii. analysis of other schools and organizations, if any, that have 36 implemented facial recognition technology and other biometric identify- 37 ing technology programs; 38 ix. the appropriateness and potential implications of using any exist- 39 ing databases, including but not limited to, local law enforcement data- 40 bases, as part of biometric identifying technology; 41 x. whether, and in what manner such biometric identifying technology 42 should be assessed and audited, including but not limited to, vendor 43 datasets, adherence to appropriate standards of algorithmic fairness, 44 accuracy, and other performance metrics, including with respect to 45 subgroups of persons based on race, national origin, gender, and age; 46 xi. whether, and in what manner, the use of such technology should be 47 disclosed by signs and the like in such schools, as well as communicated 48 to parents, guardians, students, and district residents; and 49 xii. existing legislation, including but not limited to section two-d 50 of the education law, that may be implicated by or in conflict with 51 biometric technology to ensure the maintenance of records related to the 52 use of such technology, protect the privacy interests of data subjects, 53 and avoid any breaches of data. 54 b. The director, in consultation with the commissioner of education, 55 shall consult with stakeholders and other interested parties when 56 preparing such report. The state education department, the division of 
 S. 3827 3 1 criminal justice services, law enforcement authorities and the state 2 university of New York and the city university of New York shall, to the 3 extent practicable, identify and provide representatives to the office 4 of information technology, at the request of the director, in order to 5 participate in the development and drafting of such report. 6 4. The director shall, via scheduled public hearings and other 7 outreach methods, seek feedback from teachers, school administrators, 8 parents, individuals with expertise in school safety and security, and 9 individuals with expertise in data privacy issues and student privacy 10 issues, and individuals with expertise in civil rights and civil liber- 11 ties prior to making such recommendations.] 12 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.