S 4067: Codifies the disparate impact standard in the human rights law; provides that in cases of alleged housing discrimination, an unlawful discriminatory practice may be established by a practice's discriminatory effect.
The bill aims to amend the Executive Law to codify the disparate impact standard in the Human Rights Law. It allows for a discriminatory practice to be established by its effect, even if not motivated by intent, as long as it is supported by a legally sufficient justification. A practice has a discriminatory effect if it results in a disparate impact on a protected group or creates, increases, reinforces, or perpetuates segregated housing patterns. A legally sufficient justification exists where the practice is necessary to achieve substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests and cannot be served by another practice with a less discriminatory effect. The complainant bears the burden of proof to show that a challenged practice caused or will cause a discriminatory effect, and the respondent bears the burden of proof to show that the practice is necessary. The bill does not limit…
| Jun. 11, 2025 | SUBSTITUTED BY A4040A |
| Jun. 04, 2025 | ADVANCED TO THIRD READING |
| May. 29, 2025 | 2ND REPORT CAL. |
| May. 28, 2025 | 1ST REPORT CAL.1439 |
| Feb. 24, 2025 | AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS |
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 4067 2025-2026 Regular Sessions IN SENATE January 31, 2025 ___________ Introduced by Sens. KAVANAGH, MYRIE, CLEARE, BAILEY, BASKIN, BRISPORT, BROUK, COMRIE, COONEY, FAHY, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, KRUEGER, LIU, MAY, MAYER, RAMOS, RIVERA, SANDERS, SEPULVEDA, WEBB -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Government Oper- ations AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to codifying the dispa- rate impact standard in the human rights law The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new 2 subdivision 5-a to read as follows: 3 5-a. (a) For any case alleging housing discrimination under this 4 section, an unlawful discriminatory practice may be established by a 5 practice's discriminatory effect, even if such practice was not moti- 6 vated by a discriminatory intent. The practice may still be lawful if 7 supported by a legally sufficient justification, as defined in paragraph 8 (c) of this subdivision. 9 (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, a practice has a discrimina- 10 tory effect where it actually or predictably results in a disparate 11 impact on a group of persons or creates, increases, reinforces, or 12 perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of race, creed, color, 13 national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, 14 gender identity or expression, military status, sex, age, disability, 15 marital status, status as a victim of domestic violence, lawful source 16 of income or familial. 17 (c) (1) A legally sufficient justification exists where the challenged 18 practice: 19 (i) is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate, 20 nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent; and EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD05110-02-5S. 4067 2 1 (ii) those interests could not be served by another practice that has 2 a less discriminatory effect. 3 (2) A legally sufficient justification shall be supported by evidence 4 and may not be hypothetical or speculative. The burdens of proof for 5 establishing each of the two elements of a legally sufficient justifica- 6 tion are set forth in paragraph (d) of this subdivision. 7 (d) (1) The complainant shall have the burden of proving that a chal- 8 lenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory 9 effect. 10 (2) Once the complainant satisfies the burden of proof set forth in 11 subparagraph one of this paragraph, the respondent shall have the burden 12 of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or 13 more substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests of the 14 respondent. 15 (3) If the respondent satisfies the burden of proof set forth in 16 subparagraph two of this paragraph, the complainant may still prevail 17 upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory inter- 18 ests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another prac- 19 tice that has a less discriminatory effect. 20 (e) A demonstration that a practice is supported by a legally suffi- 21 cient justification, as defined in paragraph (c) of this subdivision, 22 may not be used as a defense against a claim of intentional discrimi- 23 nation. 24 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all 25 cases alleging unlawful discriminatory practices constituting housing 26 discrimination occurring on and after such effective date. Effective 27 immediately, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regu- 28 lation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective 29 date are authorized to be made on or before such effective date.