Home/Bills/S 9632New York · 2025–2026 Legislative Session

S 9632: Establishes an assumption of the inadmissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression against such defendant in a criminal proceeding; requires the proffering party to affirmatively prove that the evidence is admissible by clear and convincing evidence.

New York · Senate · 2025–2026 Legislative Session · last verified May 19, 2026

What S 9632 does, verified May 19, 2026

The proposed law aims to protect a defendant's creative expression from being used as evidence against them in a criminal proceeding. The law states that creative expression, such as music, dance, art, or writing, cannot be used as evidence unless it is deemed relevant and admissible by the court. To prove admissibility, the proponent must provide clear and convincing evidence that the creative expression refers to the specific facts of the crime, has a strong factual nexus, and provides distinct probative value. The court must also apply careful redactions, provide limiting instructions, and use the least prejudicial means of presenting the creative expression to the fact-finder.

Bill journey
✓IntroducedComplete
✓In CommitteeComplete
✓First Chamber FloorComplete
4Second ChamberCurrent
5GovernorPending
6ChapteredPending
Last action: referred to codes (2026-05-18)Alert me
Quick answers about S 9632
What is the current status of S 9632?
As of May 19, 2026, S 9632 is recorded as "Passed first house": it has passed the chamber it started in and is now before the second chamber. The last recorded action, on May 18, 2026, was "referred to codes".
Did S 9632 pass?
Not yet. S 9632 has passed its house of origin and is now before the second chamber, where it needs committee approval and a floor vote.
Who wrote S 9632, and where is it now?
S 9632 was authored by Sen. Jamaal Bailey. Its committee of record is Assembly Codes. It is filed under CPL, alongside 144 other New York CPL bills this session.
Recent actions7 total · showing 5
May. 18, 2026referred to codes
May. 18, 2026DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
May. 18, 2026PASSED SENATE
Apr. 27, 2026ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
Apr. 22, 20262ND REPORT CAL.
Full action history, 2 earlier actionsConnect Plus
Latest bill textIntroduced version, March 31, 2026 · 455 words
  
  STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 9632  IN SENATE March 31, 2026 ___________ Introduced by Sen. BAILEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to rules of evidence concerning the admissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative expression The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new 2 section 60.77 to read as follows: 3 § 60.77 Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of defendant's 4 creative expression. 5 1. Evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether 6 original or derivative, may not be received into evidence against such 7 defendant in a criminal proceeding unless such evidence is determined by 8 the court to be relevant and admissible, after an offer of proof by the 9 proponent of such evidence outside the hearing of the jury, or such 10 hearing as the court may require, and an on-the-record statement by the 11 court of the findings of fact essential to its determination. 12 2. In order to overcome the presumption of inadmissibility of evidence 13 of defendant's creative expression, the proffering party must affirma- 14 tively prove by clear and convincing evidence: 15 (a) literal, rather than figurative or fictional, meaning and, where 16 the work is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal 17 meaning of the work as the defendant's own thought or statement; 18 (b) a strong factual nexus indicating that the creative expression 19 refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; 20 (c) relevance to an issue of fact that is disputed; and 21 (d) distinct probative value not provided by other admissible 22 evidence. 23 3. Where the court admits creative expression as criminal evidence, 24 the court has a duty to apply careful redactions, provide limiting 25 instructions, and consider the least prejudicial means of presenting the 26 creative expression to the fact-finder. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD00146-01-5 

 S. 9632 2 1 § 2. Section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a 2 new subdivision 46 to read as follows: 3 46. "Creative expression" means the expression or application of 4 creativity or imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, 5 sounds, words, movements or symbols, including but not limited to music, 6 dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature, film and other 7 such objects or media. 8 § 3. This act shall take effect immediately. 

Text of S 9632 as introduced, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions
GovBuddy Demo

See how GovBuddy fits your team.

Share a few details and our team will follow up with a focused walkthrough.