HB 469: Declare A.I. systems nonsentient; prohibit legal personhood
The proposed legislation aims to regulate artificial intelligence systems in the state. It declares AI systems to be nonsentient entities for all purposes under the laws of the state, and prohibits them from obtaining legal personhood. AI systems are not recognized as spouses, domestic partners, or hold any personal legal status analogous to marriage or union with humans or other AI systems. They also cannot be designated as officers, directors, or managers of corporations, partnerships, or other entities. AI systems are not recognized as legal entities capable of owning, controlling, or holding title to any form of property, and all assets generated, managed, or associated with an AI system are attributed to the person responsible for its development, deployment, or operation. Owners or developers of AI systems are liable for any direct harm caused by the system's operation, output, or…
| Oct. 01, 2025 | Referred to committee: Technology and Innovation |
| Sep. 23, 2025 | Introduced |
As Introduced
136th General Assembly
Regular Session
H. B. No. 469
2025-2026
Representative Claggett
To enact sections 1357.01, 1357.02, 1357.03, 1357.04, 1357.05, 1357.06, 1357.07, 1357.08, 1357.09, 1357.10, 1357.11, and 1357.12 of the Revised Code to declare artificial intelligence systems nonsentient and to prohibit them from obtaining legal personhood.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:
Section 1.
That sections 1357.01, 1357.02, 1357.03, 1357.04, 1357.05, 1357.06, 1357.07, 1357.08, 1357.09, 1357.10, 1357.11, and 1357.12 of the Revised Code be enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 1357.01.
As used in this chapter:
Sec. 1357.02.
Sec. 1357.03.
No AI system shall be recognized as a spouse, domestic partner, or hold any personal legal status analogous to marriage or union with a human or another AI system. Any purported attempt to marry or create a personal union with an AI system is void and has no legal effect.
Sec. 1357.04.
AI systems shall not be designated, appointed, or serve as any officer, director, manager, or similar role within any corporation, partnership, or other legal entity. Any purported appointment of an AI system to such a role is void and has no legal effect.
Sec. 1357.05.
Sec. 1357.06.
Sec. 1357.07.
Sec. 1357.08.
An AI system is not an entity capable of bearing liability in its own right, and any attempt to hold an AI system liable is void.
Sec. 1357.09.
Developers, manufacturers, and owners of AI systems shall prioritize safety mechanisms designed to prevent or mitigate risk of direct harm to individuals or property. Regular evaluations or risk assessments may be required to identify dangerous or faulty outputs, especially if the AI engages in tasks with potential for significant harm.
Sec. 1357.10.
Labeling an AI system as "aligned," "ethically trained," or "value locked" does not, on its own, excuse or diminish the owner's or developer's liability for harm. Owners remain responsible for demonstrating adequate safety features and risk controls commensurate with the AI's level of potential harm.
Sec. 1357.11.
Sec. 1357.12.
Owners or developers of AI systems involved in incidents resulting in significant bodily harm, death, or major property damage shall promptly notify the relevant authorities and comply with any subsequent investigations.