Assembly BillChaptered/SignedCivil Procedure
AB 223: Jury selection: acknowledgment and agreement.
What AB 223 does, verified December 6, 2025
This bill aims to amend the code of civil procedure to improve the jury selection process. The trial judge will no longer examine the prospective jurors in jury trials, and instead, each party will have the opportunity to examine them after this initial step. The bill requires prospective jurors to sign an acknowledgment and agreement prior to their examination, stating that they are truthful and willing to serve. Additionally, the bill requires a new acknowledgment and agreement from the selected jurors after they have been chosen for the trial.
Bill journey
✓IntroducedComplete
✓In CommitteeComplete
✓First Chamber FloorComplete
✓Second ChamberComplete
✓GovernorComplete
6ChapteredCurrent
Last action: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 29, Statutes of 2025. (2025-06-27)Alert me
Author and sponsors
Full contact details, staff, and committees with Connect, $16/moUnlockRecent actions17 total · showing 5
| Jul. 14, 2025 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 29, Statutes of 2025. |
| Jul. 14, 2025 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Jul. 03, 2025 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m. |
| Jun. 27, 2025 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1810.). |
| Jun. 27, 2025 | In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. |
Latest bill textChaptered version, July 14, 2025 · 414 words
Assembly Bill No. 223
CHAPTER 29
An act to amend Section 232 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.
[ Approved by Governor July 14, 2025. Filed with Secretary of State July 14, 2025. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 223, Pacheco. Jury selection: acknowledgment and agreement.
The Trial Jury Selection and Management Act requires all persons be selected for jury service at random and from sources inclusive of a representative cross section of the population of the area served by the court. Existing law requires a trial judge to examine the prospective jurors in jury trials. Existing law gives the counsel for each party, after this initial examination, the right to examine any of the prospective jurors, as specified, in order to enable counsel to intelligently exercise both peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. Existing law requires, prior to the examination of prospective trial jurors in the panel assigned for voir dire, a specified perjury acknowledgment and agreement to be obtained from the prospective jurors. Existing law requires, after the selection of the trial jury is completed, another specified acknowledgment and agreement to be obtained from the trial jurors.
This bill would revise the acknowledgment and agreements obtained from the jury panel prior to the examination of prospective trial jurors assigned for voir dire and after the completion of selection of trial jurors.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 232 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:232.
(a) Prior to the examination of prospective trial jurors in the panel assigned for voir dire, the following perjury acknowledgment and agreement shall be obtained from the panel, which shall be acknowledged by the prospective jurors with the statement “I do”:“Do you understand and agree, under penalty of perjury, that you will accurately and truthfully answer all questions about your qualifications and ability to serve as a juror in this case, and that failure to do so may result in criminal prosecution?”
(b) As soon as the selection of the trial jury is completed, the following acknowledgment and agreement shall be obtained from the trial jurors, which shall be acknowledged by the statement “I do”:
“Do you understand and agree that you will carefully consider the case being heard in this court, and that you will reach a verdict based only on the evidence presented to you and the instructions on the law given by the court?”
Text of AB 223 as chaptered, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions