(d) The study shall consist of a comprehensive analysis of the opportunities, constraints, technical considerations, and recommendations relevant to increasing the threshold under which residential developments of between 3 and 10 units may be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) while maintaining health and safety and without materially reducing development feasibility. The study shall include both of the following:
(1) An analysis of all of the following:
(A) The conditions under which residential developments of between 3 and 10 units may be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) while achieving life safety outcomes equal to or superior to otherwise applicable requirements of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) for residential developments of similar height, floor area, and occupancy classification. The study shall evaluate those life safety outcomes using probabilistic and comparative risk analysis.
(B) The building types, site conditions, construction types, height limits, floor area limits, unit count limits, egress conditions, fire and life safety systems, and other objective criteria under which residential developments of between 3 and 10 units may be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(C) Analysis of fire loss history in jurisdictions that have adopted or studied similar provisions; review of available National Fire Protection Association fire loss and fire protection system performance data, together with other available system reliability data; and consultation with fire service personnel regarding fire suppression and rescue techniques in the residential developments evaluated pursuant to this section. The study shall use probabilistic and comparative risk analysis and shall not rely solely on worst-case-scenario assumptions. If existing data is insufficient, the study may also include smoke modeling, egress modeling, or other analyses necessary to evaluate life safety outcomes.
(D) The extent to which life safety outcomes from residential developments evaluated pursuant to this section compare both to smaller one-family and two-family dwellings and to larger multifamily residential buildings subject to otherwise applicable provisions of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(E) The feasibility implications of allowing residential developments of between 3 and 10 units to be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including effects on constructability, code compliance, permitting, inspection, project delivery, and the practical ability to build small-scale multifamily housing.
(F) Cost implications of allowing residential developments of between 3 and 10 units to be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including cost-saving opportunities, tradeoffs, alternative compliance approaches, and other means of reducing unnecessary construction costs while maintaining health and safety.
(G) The interaction of any proposed California Residential Code pathway with the California Electrical Code (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), the California Mechanical Code (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), the California Plumbing Code (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), the California Energy Code (Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), and other applicable parts of the California Building Standards Code.
(H) A comparison of currently adopted California building standards with alternative code approaches used or studied in other jurisdictions, including other states, including, but not limited to, Alaska, Montana, and North Carolina, for small-scale multifamily buildings.
(I) Any code provisions, limitations, safeguards, mitigations, inspection or maintenance requirements, or alternative compliance measures that may be necessary to maintain health and safety while allowing residential developments of between 3 and 10 units to be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(J) Any administrative, permitting, inspection, or enforcement considerations relevant to the safe and feasible implementation of a California Residential Code pathway for residential development of between 3 and 10 units.
(K) Any other subjects the department identifies through the course of preparing the study that would contribute to determining how residential developments of between 3 and 10 units may be safely and feasibly designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(2) Recommendations to the state based on the study for all of the following:
(A) Specific amendments to state building standards that would allow residential developments of between 3 and 10 units to be designed and constructed under the California Residential Code (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).
(B) Any objective limitations, safeguards, or alternative compliance measures necessary to maintain health and safety.
(C) Any code simplifications, cost-saving measures, or alternative compliance approaches that could improve the feasibility of small-scale multifamily housing without reducing health and safety.
(D) Any administrative, permitting, inspection, or enforcement changes that would facilitate safe implementation of the recommended standards.