Assembly BillChaptered/SignedFamily
AB 1657: Domestic violence: restraining orders.
What AB 1657 does, verified September 21, 2026
<p>This bill aims to improve the process of issuing restraining orders to prevent domestic violence. Currently, a court can issue an ex parte restraining order if it has reasonable proof of past abuse, but the order must be issued or denied on the same day the application is submitted. The proposed law would allow courts to issue restraining orders without prior notice to the restrained party, and would also prohibit courts from requiring explanations or justifications for not providing notice.</p> <p>The bill also seeks to eliminate any rules or practices that contradict the new provisions, ensuring that the process is streamlined and more efficient for victims of domestic violence.</p>
Bill journey
✓IntroducedComplete
✓In CommitteeComplete
✓First Chamber FloorComplete
✓Second ChamberComplete
✓GovernorComplete
6ChapteredCurrent
Last action: Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 368, Statutes of 2026. (2026-09-20)Alert me
Author and sponsors
Full contact details, staff, and committees with Connect, $16/moUnlockRecent actions18 total · showing 5
| Sep. 20, 2026 | Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 368, Statutes of 2026. |
| Sep. 20, 2026 | Approved by the Governor. |
| Aug. 24, 2026 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m. |
| Aug. 17, 2026 | In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. |
| Aug. 17, 2026 | Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.). |
Latest bill textEnrolled version, August 19, 2026 · 742 words
| Enrolled August 19, 2026 |
| Passed IN Senate August 17, 2026 |
| Passed IN Assembly May 04, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly April 28, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly March 11, 2026 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 1657
| Introduced by Assembly Member Rogers (Coauthors: Assembly Members Bauer-Kahan, Connolly, Dixon, Kalra, Pacheco, Stefani, and Zbur) |
January 29, 2026 |
An act to amend Sections 6300 and 6326 of the Family Code, relating to domestic violence.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1657, Rogers. Domestic violence: restraining orders.
Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte restraining order to prevent abuse based on reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse. Existing law authorizes the order to be issued solely on the affidavit or testimony of the person requesting the ex parte restraining order. Existing law requires the ex parte order to be issued or denied on the same day the application is submitted to the court, except as specified. Existing law prohibits an ex parte restraining order from being denied solely because the other party was not provided with notice.
This bill would instead prohibit a court from requiring that notice be provided to the party to be restrained in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order. The bill would also prohibit a court from requiring an explanation or declaration for not providing notice in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order. The bill would prohibit a court from adopting or maintaining any rule, form, or practice that is inconsistent with these provisions.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 6300 of the Family Code is amended to read:6300.
(a) An order may be issued under this part to restrain a person for the purpose specified in Section 6220 if an affidavit or testimony and any additional information provided to the court pursuant to Section 6306 shows, to the satisfaction of the court, reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse. The court may issue an order under this part based solely on the affidavit or testimony of the person requesting the restraining order.(b) The court shall not require notice to be provided to the party to be restrained in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6320) of Chapter 2. The court shall not require an explanation or declaration for not providing notice in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order. An ex parte restraining order shall not be denied, in whole or in part, because the other party was not provided with notice. A court shall not adopt or maintain any rule, form, or practice that is inconsistent with this subdivision.
(c) An ex parte request for a protective order, as defined in Section 6218, shall not be rejected for filing by the court clerk if it is submitted on mandatory Judicial Council forms, includes all of the forms required to issue an order, and identifies the party submitting the request and the party who is the subject of the requested order.
SEC. 2.
Section 6326 of the Family Code is amended to read:6326.
(a) An ex parte order under this article shall be issued or denied on the same day that the application is submitted to the court, unless the application is filed too late in the day to permit effective review, in which case the order shall be issued or denied on the next day of judicial business in sufficient time for the order to be filed that day with the clerk of the court.(b) The court shall not require notice to be provided to the party to be restrained in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order. The court shall not require an explanation or declaration for not providing notice in advance of accepting a filing for, or deciding, an application for an ex parte restraining order. An ex parte restraining order shall not be denied, in whole or in part, because the other party was not provided with notice. A court shall not adopt or maintain any rule, form, or practice that is inconsistent with this subdivision.
Text of AB 1657 as enrolled, from the official record. Connect Plus keeps every version and highlights what changed.Compare versions